Andersen. P., Petersen N.C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 39, 1261–1264.

[2] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. (1952) Chance constraints and normal deviates, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 57 (1952) 134–148.

[3] Charnes A., Cooper W.W. (1961), Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming; John Wiley, New York.

[4] Charnes, A., Cooper W.W., E. Rhodes. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, (4) 429–444.

[5] Cook, W.D. and Krees, M., (1990). A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Management Science 36, 11, pp. 1302-1310.

[6] Foroughi, A.A., Tamiz, M. (2005). An effective total ranking model for a ranked voting system, Omega 33, 491–496.

[7] Green, R.H., Doyle, J.R. and Cook, W.D. (1996). Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 90, 3, pp. 461-472.

[8] Ganley, J.A, Cubbin, J.S. (1992) Public sector efficiency measurement: applications of data envelopment analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland;

[9] Hashimoto, A. (1997). A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note. European Journal of Operational Research 97, 3, pp. 600-604.

[10] Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Khanmohammadi, M., & Kazemimanesh, M. (2012) A method for discrimination efficient candidates with ranked voting data by common weightMathematical and Computational Applications, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.1-8*.*

[11] Kao, C., Hung, H.T. (2005) Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56 (10), 1196–1203.

[12] Kornbluth J. (1991), Analysing policy effectiveness using cone restricted data envelopment analysis; Journal of the Operational Research Society 42; 1097-1104.

[13] Lee, S.M. (1973) Goal programming for decision analysis of multiple objectives, Sloan Manage. Rev. 14 , 11–24.

[14] Lee, S.M., Clayton, S.R. (1972) A goal programming model for academic resource allocation, Manage. Sci. 18 (8), B395–B408.

[15] Liu, F.H.F., Peng, H.H. (2008) Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights, Comput. Oper. Res. 35 (5), 1624–1637.

[16] Noguchi, H., Ogawa, M., and Ishii, H. (2002). The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 146, 155–166.

[17] Obata, T. and Ishii, H. (2003). A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data. European Journal of Operational Research 151, 1, pp. 233-237.

[18] Tompson, F.D., Singleton, JR., Thrall, R.M., Smith B.A. (1986) Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High Energy Lab in Texas, Intetfaces, 1380-1395

[19] Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., and Yang, J.B. (2007). Three new models for preference voting and aggregation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58 1389–1393.

[20] Wang, Y.M., Luo, Y., Lan, Y.X. (2011) Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis, Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (8), 9122–9128.

[21] Wang, Y.M., Luo, Y. (2006) DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units, Appl. Math. Comput. 173 (2) (2006) 902–915.

[22] Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., and Liang, L. (2009). Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 223(1), 469–484.

[23] Zerafat Angiz, M. Z., Emrouznejad, A., Mustafa, A., and Rashidi Komijan, A. (2009). Selecting the most preferable alternatives in group decision making problemusing DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 9599–9602.