Andersen. P., Petersen N.C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 39, 1261–1264.
 Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. (1952) Chance constraints and normal deviates, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 57 (1952) 134–148.
 Charnes A., Cooper W.W. (1961), Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming; John Wiley, New York.
 Charnes, A., Cooper W.W., E. Rhodes. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, (4) 429–444.
 Cook, W.D. and Krees, M., (1990). A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Management Science 36, 11, pp. 1302-1310.
 Foroughi, A.A., Tamiz, M. (2005). An effective total ranking model for a ranked voting system, Omega 33, 491–496.
 Green, R.H., Doyle, J.R. and Cook, W.D. (1996). Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 90, 3, pp. 461-472.
 Ganley, J.A, Cubbin, J.S. (1992) Public sector efficiency measurement: applications of data envelopment analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland;
 Hashimoto, A. (1997). A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note. European Journal of Operational Research 97, 3, pp. 600-604.
 Jahanshahloo, G.R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Khanmohammadi, M., & Kazemimanesh, M. (2012) A method for discrimination efficient candidates with ranked voting data by common weightMathematical and Computational Applications, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp.1-8.
 Kao, C., Hung, H.T. (2005) Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach, J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56 (10), 1196–1203.
 Kornbluth J. (1991), Analysing policy effectiveness using cone restricted data envelopment analysis; Journal of the Operational Research Society 42; 1097-1104.
 Lee, S.M. (1973) Goal programming for decision analysis of multiple objectives, Sloan Manage. Rev. 14 , 11–24.
 Lee, S.M., Clayton, S.R. (1972) A goal programming model for academic resource allocation, Manage. Sci. 18 (8), B395–B408.
 Liu, F.H.F., Peng, H.H. (2008) Ranking of units on the DEA frontier with common weights, Comput. Oper. Res. 35 (5), 1624–1637.
 Noguchi, H., Ogawa, M., and Ishii, H. (2002). The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 146, 155–166.
 Obata, T. and Ishii, H. (2003). A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data. European Journal of Operational Research 151, 1, pp. 233-237.
 Tompson, F.D., Singleton, JR., Thrall, R.M., Smith B.A. (1986) Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High Energy Lab in Texas, Intetfaces, 1380-1395
 Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S., and Yang, J.B. (2007). Three new models for preference voting and aggregation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58 1389–1393.
 Wang, Y.M., Luo, Y., Lan, Y.X. (2011) Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis, Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (8), 9122–9128.
 Wang, Y.M., Luo, Y. (2006) DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units, Appl. Math. Comput. 173 (2) (2006) 902–915.
 Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., and Liang, L. (2009). Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 223(1), 469–484.
 Zerafat Angiz, M. Z., Emrouznejad, A., Mustafa, A., and Rashidi Komijan, A. (2009). Selecting the most preferable alternatives in group decision making problemusing DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 9599–9602.