Proposing a Decision Making System in Three-Dimensional Concurrent Engineering by Considering the Investment Risk


1 Department Of Industrial Engineering , Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najaf abad, Iran

2 Engineering Department, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, P. O. Box: 416, Iran


One of  the great challenges of  most of the investment companies is the analysis of investment risk costs in the development of new products, in the initial stages of production. This study develops the appropriate methods for the analysis of kinds of investment risk costs, within the three-dimensional concurrent engineering. This study presents a suggested model based on multi-objective programming and multi-attribute decision-making. This model considers the qualitative and quantitative parameters relevant to the process of new product creation, such as supply chain parameters, and investment risk for each project in the early stages of product design. And at the end, it identifies and selects the best design with minimum of investment risk cost.


Andersen, M., Kohler, S. and Lund, T. (1986). “Design for Assembly”. IFS Publications, London. Avnet, M. and Annalisa L. (2010). “An application of the Design Structure Matrix to Integrated Concurrent Engineering”. Journal of Acta Astronautica, Vol. 66, No. 5–6, pp. 937-949.

Ayag, Z. and Ozdemir, R.G. (2009) . “A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process”. Journal of Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 368– 379.

Balasubramanian, R. (2001). “Concurrent engineering–a powerful enabler of supply chain management”. Quality Progress, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 47-53.

Buyukozkan, G. and Feyzıoglu, O. (2004). “A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development”. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 90, No. 1, pp. 27–45.

Chen, H. (2004). A research based on fuzzy AHP for multi-criteria supplier selection in supply chain. Master thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Department of Industrial Management (ETD).

Demoly, F., Dutartre, O., Yan, X., Eynard, B., Kiritsis, D. and Gomes, S. (2013). “Product relationships management enabler for concurrent engineering and product lifecycle management”. Journal of Computers in Industry, Vol. 64, No. 7, pp. 833-848 .

Feng, C.X., Wang, J. and Wang, J.S. (2001). “An optimization model for concurrent selection of tolerances and suppliers”. Journal of Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 1-2, pp. 15–33.

Fine, C. (1998). Clockspeed, Perseus Books, NewYork, NY. Fine, C.H., Golany, B. and Naseraldin, H. (2005). “Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach”. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 23, no. 3-4, pp. 389–403.

Lamghabbar, A., Yacout, S. and Ouali, M.S. (2004) . “Concurrent optimization of the design and manufacturing stages of product development”. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42, No. 21, pp. 4495-4512.

Liou, T. S. and Wang, M.T. (1992). “Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 247–255.

Mas, F. Menéndez, J.L. Oliva, and Ríos, M.J. ( 2013). “Collaborative Engineering: An Airbus Case Study”. Article Procedia Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 336-345.

Parker, j. (2008). “Risk management, risk management dimensions, definition and application of financial organizations”. Financial Research, Vol. 13-14, No. 4, pp. 125-144 (In Persian).

Schniederjans, M.J. and Hong, S. (1996). “Multi-objective concurrent engineering: A goal programming approach”. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 202-209.

Shahrokhi, M., Bernard, A. and Shidpour, H. (2011). “A Hybrid Method to Select Best Process and Suppliers”, in the Concurrent Engineering Environment World Congress, Vol. 18, No. 1.

Shahrokhi, M., Bernard, A. and Shidpour, H. (2011). “An Integrated Method Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and Linear Programming for Supplier Selection Problem”. World Congress, Vol. 18, No. 1.

shidpour, H., Bernard, A. and Shahrokhi, M. (2013) . “A Group Decision-making Method based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set in the Three Dimensional Concurrent Engineering Environment: A Multi-Objective Programming Approach”. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 533-538.

shidpour, H., Bernard, A. and Shahrokhi, M. (2013). “A multi-objective programming approach, integrated into the TOPSIS method, in order to optimize product design; in three-dimensional concurrent engineering”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 875-885.

Tiwari, R.N., Dharmar, S. and Rao, J.K. (1987), “Fuzzy Goal Programming An Addituie Model”. Fuzzy Sets and systems. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 27-34.

Valle, S. and Vázquez-Bustelo, D. (2009). “Concurrent engineering performance: Incremental versus radical innovation”. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 136- 148.

Winner, R.J., Pennell J.P., Bertend H.E. and Slusarczuk M.M.G. (1988). The Role of Concurrent Engineering in Weapon System Acquisition, IDA Report R-338, Institute for Defense Systems Analysis, Alexandra VA.

Xiaoting Wang, Evangelos Triantaphyllou (2005). “Ranking Irregularities When Evaluating Alternatives by Using Some Electre Methods”.