Alavidoost, M. H. (2017). Assembly line balancing problems in uncertain environment: a novel interactive fuzzy approach for solving multi-objective fuzzy assembly line balancing problems. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
 Alavidoost, M. H., Tarimoradi, M., & Zarandi, M. F. (2015). Fuzzy adaptive genetic algorithm for multi-objective assembly line balancing problems. Applied soft computing, 34, 655-677.
 Tarimoradi, M., Alavidoost, M. H., & Zarandi, M. F. (2015). Comparative corrigendum note on papers “Fuzzy adaptive GA for multi-objective assembly line balancing” continued “Modified GA for different types of assembly line balancing with fuzzy processing times”: differences and similarities. Applied soft computing, 35, 786-788.
 Alavidoost, M. H., Babazadeh, H., & Sayyari, S. T. (2016). An interactive fuzzy programming approach for bi-objective straight and U-shaped assembly line balancing problem. Applied soft computing, 40, 221-235.
 Alavidoost, M. H., Zarandi, M. F., Tarimoradi, M., & Nemati, Y. (2017). Modified genetic algorithm for simple straight and U-shaped assembly line balancing with fuzzy processing times. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 28(2), 313-336.
 Alavidoost, M. H., & Nayeri, M. A. (2014). Proposition of a hybrid NSGA-II algorithm with fuzzy objectives for bi-objective assembly line balancing problem. Tenth international industrial engineering conference.
 Alavidoost, M. H., Tarimoradi, M., & Zarandi, M. F. (2018). Bi-objective mixed-integer nonlinear programming for multi-commodity tri-echelon supply chain networks. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 29(4), 809-826.
 Babazadeh, H., Alavidoost, M. H., Zarandi, M. F., & Sayyari, S. T. (2018). An enhanced NSGA-II algorithm for fuzzy bi-objective assembly line balancing problems. Computers & industrial engineering, 123, 189-208.
 Zarandi, M. F., Tarimoradi, M., Alavidoost, M. H., & Shakeri, B. (2015, August). Fuzzy approximate reasoning toward Multi-objective optimization policy: deployment for supply chain programming. 2015 annual conference of the north american fuzzy information processing society (nafips) held jointly with 2015 5th world conference on soft computing (WConSC)(pp. 1-6). Redmond, WA, USA: IEEE.
 Zarandi, M. F., Tarimoradi, M., Alavidoost, M. H., & Shirazi, M. A. (2015, August). Fuzzy comparison dashboard for multi-objective evolutionary applications: an implementation in supply chain planning. 2015 annual conference of the north american fuzzy information processing society (nafips) held jointly with 2015 5th world conference on soft computing (WConSC)(pp. 1-6). Redmond, WA, USA: IEEE.
 Nemati, Y., & Alavidoost, M. H. (2018). A fuzzy bi-objective MILP approach to integrate sales, production, distribution and procurement planning in a FMCG supply chain. Soft computing, 1-20.
 Nemati, Y., Madhoushi, M., & Alavidoost, M. H. (2017). Modeling of S&OP in a large scale dairy supply chain. Scholar's Press.
 Kao, C. (2014). Network data envelopment analysis: a review. European journal of operational research, 239(1), 1-16.
 Shahrasbi, A., Shamizanjani, M., Alavidoost, M. H., & Akhgar, B. (2017). An aggregated fuzzy model for the selection of a managed security service provider. International journal of information technology & decision making, 16(03), 625-684.
 Mahmoudabadi, M. Z., Azar, A., & Emrouznejad, A. (2018). A novel multilevel network slacks-based measure with an application in electric utility companies. Energy, 158, 1120-1129.
 Shermeh, H. E., Najafi, S. E., & Alavidoost, M. H. (2016). A novel fuzzy network SBM model for data envelopment analysis: a case study in Iran regional power companies. Energy, 112, 686-697.
 Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. L. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic planning sciences, 61, 4-8.
 Olatubi, W. O., & Dismukes, D. E. (2000). A data envelopment analysis of the levels and determinants of coal-fired electric power generation performance. Utilities policy, 9(2), 47-59.
 Lam, P. L., & Shiu, A. (2001). A data envelopment analysis of the efficiency of China’s thermal power generation. Utilities policy, 10(2), 75-83.
 Nag, B. (2006). Estimation of carbon baselines for power generation in India: the supply side approach. Energy policy, 34(12), 1399-1410.
 Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2012). Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry. European journal of operational research, 216(3), 668-678.
 Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M., & Ueno, T. (2010). Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies. Energy policy, 38(4), 1675-1688.
 Pahwa, A., Feng, X., & Lubkeman, D. (2003). Performance evaluation of electric distribution utilities based on data envelopment analysis. IEEE transactions on power systems, 18(1), 400-405.
 Sanhueza, R., Rudnick, H., & Lagunas, H. (2004). DEA efficiency for the determination of the electric power distribution added value. IEEE transactions on power systems, 19(2), 919-925.
 Azadeh, A., Amalnick, M. S., Ghaderi, S. F., & Asadzadeh, S. M. (2007). An integrated DEA PCA numerical taxonomy approach for energy efficiency assessment and consumption optimization in energy intensive manufacturing sectors. Energy policy, 35(7), 3792-3806.
 Agrell, P. J., & Bogetoft, P. (2005). Economic and environmental efficiency of district heating plants. Energy policy, 33(10), 1351-1362.
 Hjalmarsson, L., & Veiderpass, A. (1992). Productivity in Swedish electricity retail distribution. The Scandinavian journal of economics, S193-S205.
 Bagdadioglu, N., Price, C. M. W., & Weyman-Jones, T. G. (1996). Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: a non-parametric model of the Turkish experience. Energy economics, 18(1-2), 1-23.
 Førsund, F. R., & Kittelsen, S. A. (1998). Productivity development of Norwegian electricity distribution utilities. Resource and energy economics, 20(3), 207-224.
 Filippini, M., Wild, J., & Kuenzle, M. (2001). Scale and cost efficiency in the Swiss electricity distribution industry: evidence from a frontier cost approach. CEPE working paper, 8.