Document Type : Research Paper


1 Turkish Land Forces, Turkey.

2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Nuh Naci Yazgan University, Turkey.


Bed production has an important market in the furniture sector. In spite of the fact that sponge is generally preferred as filler in the production process of beds, increasing prices in recent years and the preference of new materials with the development of alternative filling materials have increased. Recently it is seen other than sponge, the granule, wadding, and STW are also used as filling material in bed production. From the management point of view, the choice of filler is an important decision problem that depends on the situation of the business and many objective and subjective criteria must be taken into consideration. It is appropriate to examine such a problem with the Analytical Hierarchy Method (AHP) and the ELECTRE method, which have the ability to make quantitative evaluations and synthesize factor weights from subjective judgments. The criteria for selection of the filler material and the extent to which the criterion will affect the evaluation are important decision points. The opinions of experts in bed production were consulted to determine the criteria to be used in the evaluation. The obtained results show that four basic criteria must be taken into consideration in the selection of filler material. In this study, AHP was used for determining the criteria weights, and ELECTRE methods were used for the selection of the best filling material. The results showed that wadding is the optimum filler material for bed production.


Main Subjects

[1]     Gök, A., Yapıcı, F., Gülsoy, S., Kurt, Ş., Altun, S., Kılınç, İ. & Korkmaz, M. (2014). Determination of static fatigue performance of upholstery foams. Journal of kastamonu university forest faculty, 12(2), 285-290.
[2]     Colak, H. E., Memisoglu, T., & Gercek, Y. (2020). Optimal site selection for solar photovoltaic (PV) power plants using GIS and AHP: A case study of Malatya Province, Turkey. Renewable energy149, 565-576.
[3]     Broniewicz, E., & Ogrodnik, K. (2020). Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation research part D: transport and environment83, 102351. Doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102351.
[4]     Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., & Sanyal, S. K. (2017). Group heterogeneity in multi member decision making model with an application to warehouse location selection in a supply chain. Computers & industrial engineering105, 101-122.
[5]     Castillo, C., Degamo, F., Gitgano, F., Loo, L., Pacaanas, S., Toroy, N., Ocampo, L., Sia, L. & Ocampo, C. (2017). Appropriate criteria set for personnel promotion across organizational levels using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). International journal of production management and engineering, 5(1), 11-22.
[6]     Dahri, N., & Abida, H. (2017). Monte Carlo simulation-aided analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for flood susceptibility mapping in Gabes Basin (southeastern Tunisia). Environmental earth sciences76(7), 302.
[7]     Emrouznejad, A., & Marra, M. (2017). The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis. International journal of production research55(22), 6653-6675.
[8]     Marttunen, M., Lienert, J., & Belton, V. (2017). Structuring problems for multi-criteria decision analysis in practice: a literature review of method combinations. European journal of operational research263(1), 1-17.
[9]     Botak, Z., Balič, J., & Jurković, Z. (2017). Optimising external turning tool choice using AHP and ELECTRE II methods. Technical gazette24(5), 1355-1360.
[10] Aldabbas, M., Venteicher, F., Gerber, L., & Widmer, M. (2018). Finding the adequate location scenario after the merger of fire brigades thanks to multiple criteria decision analysis methods. Foundations of computing and decision sciences43(2), 69-88.
[11] Khatrouch, I., Kermad, L., el Mhamedi, A., & Boujelbene, Y. (2017). A hybrid AHP-ELECTRE I multicriteria model for performance assessment and team selection. Organizational productivity and performance measurements using predictive modeling and analytics (pp. 115-127). IGI Global.
[12] Shahhoseini, A., & Yousefinejad Attari, M. (2018). Hybrid techniques of multi-criteria decision-making for location of automated teller machines (ATMs): Shahr bank branches in Tehran, 1st district municipality. Journal of optimization in industrial engineering11(2), 139-148.
[13] Moradi, N., Malekmohammad, H., Jamalzadeh, S. (2018). A model for performance evaluation of digital game industry using integrated AHP and BSC. Journal of applied research on ındustrial engineering, 5(2), 97-109. Doi: 10.22105/jarie.2018.130777.1037
[14] Ahmed, S., Karmaker, C., & Ahmed, M. (2019). Assessment of safety, health and environmental risk factors in garments industries of Bangladesh. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 6(3), 161-176. Doi: 10.22105/jarie.2019.191093.1093
[15] Maulidina, A., & Putra, F. (2018). Selection of tugboat gearbox supplier using the analytical hierarchy process method. Journal of applied research on ındustrial engineering, 5(3), 253-262. Doi: 10.22105/jarie.2018.138086.1042
[16] Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill New York.
[17] Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process—a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16(4), 2-124.
[18] Franek, J., & Kresta, A. (2014). Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP. Procedia economics and finance12, 164-173.
[19] Saaty, T. L. (1985). Decision making for leaders. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, (3), 450-452.
[20] Triantaphyllou, E., Shu, B., Sanchez, S. N., & Ray, T. (1998). Multi-criteria decision making: an operations research approach. Encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering15(1998), 175-186.
[21] Milani, A. S., Shanian, A., & El-Lahham, C. (2006). Using different ELECTRE methods in strategic planning in the presence of human behavioral resistance. Advances in decision sciences, 1-19.