Document Type : Research Paper
Department of Management, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
The main purpose of this paper is to identify the traditional, green and effective resilience criteria in the performance of green and resilient suppliers and their ranking with path analysis, SWARA and TOPSIS combined approach in Fanavaran Petrochemical Company. The research method is applied in terms of goal and descriptive-survey in terms of data collection. By a comprehensive review of the literature, first a set of key performance criteria and sub-criteria (traditional, green, and resilience) were extracted. Then, using the path analysis approach, the effectiveness of these criteria was evaluated in Fanavaran Petrochemical Company. The statistical population included 55 experts of the mentioned company, which due to the limited size of the population, all members were considered as the research sample. The path analysis result showed that all identified criteria affect the company’s supplier’s performance. Then, using new SWARA decision-making technique and also the opinions of 30 experts, the criteria and sub-criteria were evaluated and their weight (importance) was extracted. In the final evaluation of the main criteria, the criterion of “resilience” was in the first rank, the criterion of “green” in the second rank and the criterion of “traditional” in the last rank. Subsequently, due to the sensitivity of the ranking of green and resilient suppliers in the company, using the TOPSIS decision-making technique and based on the extractive weight of the criteria, seven suppliers of the company were evaluated by the experts and the final ranking of the suppliers in terms of performance was determined. Thus, the proposed approach of this research provides a valuable conceptual framework for company’ managers to improve the situation of the suppliers in terms of the environmental issues and resilience. Also, the development and improvement of traditional criteria and selection of suppliers of the company based on green standards and resilience were the main goals of this research.
1] Asgharizadeh, E., & Ajalli, M. (2016).Identification and ranking the key dimensions of lean manufacturing using
new approach in gas industry. Proceedings of international conference on science, technology, humanities and business management (pp. 29-30). Bangkok. Retrieved from https://socrd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/7BKK141-Identification-and-Ranking-the-Key-Dimensions-of-Lean-Manufacturing-using-NEW-Approach-in-GasIndustry.pdf
 Ajalli, M., Mozaffari, M. M., & Salahshori, R. (2019). Ranking the suppliers using a Combined SWARA-FVIKOR
approach. International journal of supply chain management, 8(1), 907.
 Akman, G. (2015). Evaluating suppliers to include green supplier development programs via fuzzy c-means and VIKOR methods. Computers and industrial engineering, 86, 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.10.013
 Amani, M., Ashrafi, A., & Dehghanan, H. (2017). Assessing the barriers to green supply chain adoption using
fuzzy DEMATEL technique. IT management studies, 5(19), 147-179.
 Maulidina, A. D., & Putra, F. E. (2018). Selection of tugboat gearbox supplier using the analytical hierarchy
process method. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 5(3), 253-262.148
 Tirkolaee, E. B., Mardani, A., Dashtian, Z., Soltani, M., & Weber, G. W. (2020). A novel hybrid
method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable
supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design. Journal of cleaner production, 250, 119517.
 Blackhurst, J., Craighead, C. W., Elkins, D., & Handfield, R. B. (2005). An empirically derived
agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. International journal of
production research, 43(19), 4067-4081. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500151549
 Carvalho, H., Barroso, A. P., Machado, V. H., Azevedo, S., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). Supply chain
redesign for resilience using simulation. Computers and industrial engineering, 62(1), 329-341.
 Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A. (2013). Structural equation modeling with PLS. Jahad University. (In
Persian). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/ArashRezazadeh/publication/264519454_Structural_Equation_Modeling_with_PLS /links/53e236d80cf2d79877aa19f1/Structural-Equation-Modeling-with-PLS.pdf
 Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of
purchasing, 2(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x
 Feng, T., Sun, L., & Zhang, Y. (2010). The effects of customer and supplier involvement on
competitive advantage: An empirical study in China. Industrial marketing management, 39(8), 1384-
 Gandhi, S., Mangla, S. K., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2015). Evaluating factors in implementation of
successful green supply chain management using DEMATEL: A case study. International strategic
management review, 3(1-2), 96-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.05.001
 Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making
approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of cleaner
production, 98, 66-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046
 Govindan, K., & Sivakumar, R. (2016). Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon
paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear
programming approaches. Annals of operations research, 238(1-2), 243-276.
 Ha, S. H., & Krishnan, R. (2008). A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a
competitive supply chain. Expert systems with applications, 34(2), 1303-1311.
 Haldar, A., Ray, A., Banerjee, D., & Ghosh, S. (2014). Resilient supplier selection under a fuzzy
environment. International journal of management science and engineering management, 9(2), 147-156.
 Hosseini, S. A., Iranban, S. J., & Mirjahanmard, S. J. (2014). Identifying & prioritizing the effective
factors on green supply chain management by using path analysis approach. Journal of production
and operations management, 5(2), 178-161.
 Masudin, I., Wastono, T., & Zulfikarijah, F. (2018). The effect of managerial intention and initiative
on green supply chain management adoption in Indonesian manufacturing performance. Cogent
business and management, 5(1), 1485212. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1485212
 Imani, D. M., & Ahmadi, A. (2009). Green supply chain management: a new strategy for gaining
competitive advantage. Journal of Automobile Engineering and related industries, 10, 14-19.
 Ghahremani-Nahr, J., Nozari, H., & Najafi, S. E. (2020). Design a green closed loop supply chain
network by considering discount under uncertainty. Journal of applied research on industrial
engineering, 7(3), 238-266.
 Jayaram, J., Xu, K., & Nicolae, M. (2011). The direct and contingency effects of supplier coordination
and customer coordination on quality and flexibility performance. International journal of production
research, 49(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.508935
 Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise
and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International journal
of production economics, 171, 116-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.023
 Muduli, K., Govindan, K., Barve, A., Kannan, D., & Geng, Y. (2013). Role of behavioural factors in
green supply chain management implementation in Indian mining industries. Resources,
conservation and recycling, 76, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.03.006
 Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green
supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. Journal of cleaner production, 96, 194-208.
 Barker, K., Ramirez-Marquez, J. E., & Hosseini, S. (2016). An approach for modeling supplier
resilience. Proceedings of the thirteenth annual acquisition research symposium thursday sessions volume
 Kuo, R. J., & Lin, Y. J. (2012). Supplier selection using analytic network process and data envelopment
analysis. International journal of production research, 50(11), 2852-2863.
 Mitra, K., Gudi, R. D., Patwardhan, S. C., & Sardar, G. (2009). Towards resilient supply chains: Uncertainty
analysis using fuzzy mathematical programming. Chemical engineering research and design, 87(7), 967-981.
 Mohammed, A., & Wang, Q. (2017). Developing a meat supply chain network design using a multi-objective
possibilistic programming approach. British food journal, 119(3), 690-706. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-
 Mohammed, A., Harris, I., Soroka, A., Naim, M. M., & Ramjaun, T. (2018, January). Evaluating green and
resilient supplier performance: AHP-fuzzy topsis decision-making approach. In Proceedings of the 7th
international conference on operations research and enterprise systems (ICORES 2018). DOI:
 Mohammed, A., & Wang, Q. (2017). The fuzzy multi-objective distribution planner for a green meat supply
chain. International journal of production economics, 184, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.016
 Mohammed, A., Wang, Q., Alyahya, S., & Bennett, N. (2017). Design and optimization of an RFID-enabled
automated warehousing system under uncertainties: a multi-criterion fuzzy programming approach. The
international journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 91(5), 1661-1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-
 Pramanik, D., Haldar, A., Mondal, S. C., Naskar, S. K., & Ray, A. (2017). Resilient supplier selection using
AHP-TOPSIS-QFD under a fuzzy environment. International journal of management science and engineering
management, 12(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2015.1101719
 Purvis, L., Spall, S., Naim, M., & Spiegler, V. (2016). Developing a resilient supply chain strategy during
‘boom’and ‘bust’. Production planning and control, 27(7-8), 579-590.
 Qin, Y., & Geng, Y. (2013). Production cost optimization model based on CODP in Mass
Customization. International journal of computer science issues (IJCSI), 10(1), 610-618.
 Rajesh, R., & Ravi, V. (2015). Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis
approach. Journal of cleaner production, 86, 343-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.054
 Pantha, R. P., Islam, M., Akter, N., & Islam, E. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection using integrated data
envelopment analysis and differential evolution model. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 7(1),
 Sahu, A. K., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2016). Evaluation and selection of resilient suppliers in fuzzy
environment. Benchmarking: An international journal, 23(3), 651- 673. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2014-0109
 Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Diabat, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for
evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resources,
conservation and recycling, 74, 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.006
 Song, W., Xu, Z., & Liu, H. C. (2017). Developing sustainable supplier selection criteria for solar air-conditioner manufacturer: An integrated approach. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 79, 1461-1471.
 Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply‐chain management: a state‐of‐the‐art literature review. International
journal of management reviews, 9(1), 53-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x
 Lee, S. Y. (2008). Drivers for the participation of small and medium‐sized suppliers in green supply chain
initiatives. Supply chain management: an international journal, 13(3), 185-198.
 Tyagi, M., Kumar, P., & Kumar, D. (2015). Parametric selection of alternatives to improve performance of
green supply chain management system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 449-457.
 Vafaei, S., Bazrkar, A., & Hajimohammadi, M. (2019). The investigation of the relationship between
sustainable supply chain management and sustainable competitive advantage according to the mediating role
of innovation and sustainable process management. Brazilian journal of operations and production
management, 16(4), 572-580.
 Wang, T. C., & Chang, T. H. (2007). Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy
environment. Expert systems with applications, 33(4), 870-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.07.003