Document Type : Research Paper


Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, General Campus, Evin, Tehran, Iran.


One of the critical concerns in the audit court is to study budgetary deviations of the executive organizations. Audit court seeks methods to evaluations the executive organizations based on their budget deviations. The aim of this study is to rank executive agencies aimed at the improvement of their performance. We use a ranking method based on data envelopment analysis that can simultaneously use multi-indexes for ranking and we use budget split indexes of the audit court for ranking of executive organizations. The results enable managers to identify the best and worst executive agencies based on the considered indexes of the budget split of the audit court. The objectives of this paper are to investigate which executive organizations have more budget deviations. Any organization that had a lower rank shows that it has based on the indexes under evaluation more deviation. To study the performance process of each of the executive agencies, we collected data for two years and analyzed the performance of the executive agencies during these two years.


Main Subjects

  1. Hghighi, M., Abadi, S., Arabian, A., & jalali, M. (2019). The law challenges of the supreme audit court supervision of Iran in contrast of corruption and its crimes in executive agencies. Journal of law and politics, 4(38), 11-34. (In Persian).
  2. Lari Dasht Bayaz, M., Ghaem Maghami, K., Maleki, A. (2016). Investigation of factors affecting in determination of performance audit criteria in governmental executive agencies. Journal of governmental accounting, 3(1), 59-68.
  3. Darabad, B. G. (2017). Supreme audit court in the legal system of Iran. European Journal of social sciences studies, 2(5), 205-216.
  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research2(6), 429-444.
  5. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science30(9), 1078-1092.
  6. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. Springer Science & Business Media.
  7. Ray, S. C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis: theory and techniques for economics and operations research. Cambridge university press.
  8. Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. New directions for program evaluation1986(32), 73-105.
  9. Cook, W. D., Kress, M., & Seiford, L. M. (1992). Prioritization models for frontier decision making units in DEA. European journal of operational research59(2), 319-323.
  10. Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management science39(10), 1261-1264.
  11. Ma, L. C., & Li, H. L. (2008). A fuzzy ranking method with range reduction techniques. European journal of operational research184(3), 1032-1043.
  12. Zerafat-Angiz L, M., Mustafa, A., & Emrouznejad, A. (2010). Ranking efficient decision-making units in data envelopment analysis using fuzzy concept. Computers & industrial engineering59(4), 712-719.
  13. Davtalab-Olyaie, M., Asgharian, M., & Nia, V. P. (2019). Stochastic ranking and dominance in DEA. International journal of production economics214, 125-138.
  14. Mohan, S., Kannusamy, A. P., & Samiappan, V. (2020). A new approach for ranking of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Journal of fuzzy extension and applications1(1), 15-26.
  15. Mirzaei, S. H., & Salehi, A. (2019). Ranking efficient DMUs using the Tchebycheff norm with fuzzy data in DEA. International journal of research in industrial engineering8(2), 158-175.
  16. Torabi, N., & Najafi, S. E. (2015). New model for ranking based on Sum Weights Disparity Index in data envelopment analysis in fuzzy condition. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering2(2), 111-119.
  17. Mirzaei, S. H. (2019). Ranking voting systems with using fuzzy logic. Journal of decisions and operations research3(4), 317-324. (In Persian).
  18. Zahedi-Seresht, M., Khosravi, S., Jablonsky, J., & Zykova, P. (2021). A data envelopment analysis model for performance evaluation and ranking of DMUs with alternative scenarios. Computers & industrial engineering152, 107002.
  19. Izadikhah, M., Roostaee, R., & Emrouznejad, A. (2021). Fuzzy data envelopment analysis with ordinal and interval data. International journal of uncertainty, fuzziness and knowledge-based systems29(03), 385-410.
  20. Adler, N., Friedman, L., & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002). Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European journal of operational research140(2), 249-265.
  21. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Khodabakhshi, M., Rostamy-Malkhlifeh, M., Moghaddas, Z., & Vaez-Ghasemi, M. (2013). A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis. Journal of applied mathematics2013.
  22. Khodabakhshi, M., & Aryavash, K. (2012). Ranking all units in data envelopment analysis. Applied mathematics letters25(12), 2066-2070.