Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of mathematics, Khorramabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad, Iran.

2 Department of Mathematics, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran.


To evaluate the performance and estimate the efficiency of Decision-Making Units (DMUs) in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), the available data are used. These data are usually divided into two categories of inputs and outputs based on their natures. If the price data is also available for inputs, it is necessary to calculate another type of the efficiency called Cost Efficiency (CE). Since the efficiency of units in such a framework is depended on the both quantities of inputs and outputs and also the prices of inputs, it is important to find the sources of cost inefficiency related to each of the factors and plans to address them. In this paper, we intend to present a new decomposition of CE and observed cost versus optimal cost, which are raised from each of the factors involved in the cost inefficiency, in a non-competitive pricing environment which the input price vector for different DMUs can be different. Moreover, for the first time, in parallel with using the PPS based on input and output quantities and introducing some cost inefficiency factors related to this set, we will introduce new sets called price and cost production sets that the first is based on the prices of inputs and output factors, and the second is based on the optimal vectors of inputs and prices obtained from two previous PPS, and then we will introduce other factors of cost inefficiency in the sets. Accordingly, new decomposition for cost inefficiencies will be presented. Also, in the previous analyzes, congestion inefficiency has not been considered as one of the important factors in cost inefficiency. In this study, we also intend to consider the impact of this factor on CE.


Main Subjects

[1]     Mombini, E., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Saraj, M., Zahraei, M., & Tayebi Khorami, R. (2021). The sustainability radius of the cost efficiency in interval data envelopment analysis: A case study from Tehran Stocks. Advances in mathematical finance and applications, 7(2), 279–291. DOI: 10.22034/AMFA.2021.1917327.1528
[2]     Sarab, R. G., Amirteimoori, A., Malek, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2021). Cost efficiency analysis in data envelopment analysis framework: An application to sugar industries. Journal of information and optimization sciences, 42(5), 1137–1161. DOI: 10.1080/02522667.2021.1885749
[3]     Long, L. K. (2022). Cost efficiency analysis in aquaculture: Data envelopment analysis with a two-stage bootstrapping technique. Aquaculture economics and management, 26(1), 77–97. DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2021.1896605
[4]     Piran, F. S., Lacerda, D. P., Camanho, A. S., & Silva, M. C. A. (2021). Internal benchmarking to assess the cost efficiency of a broiler production system combining data envelopment analysis and throughput accounting. International journal of production economics, 238, 108173. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJPE.2021.108173
[5]     Lotfi, F. H., Amirteimoori, A., Moghaddas, Z., & Vaez-Ghasemi, M. (2020). Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: a data envelopment analysis. Mathematical sciences, 14(4), 387–396. DOI: 10.1007/s40096-020-00349-2
[6]     Rezaei Hezaveh, E., Fallahnejad, R., Sanei, M., & Izadikhah, M. (2019). Development of a new cost PPS and decomposition of observed actual cost for DMU in a non-competitive space in DEA. RAIRO - operations research, 53(5), 1563–1580. DOI: 10.1051/ro/2019068
[7]     Paleckova, I. (2019). Cost efficiency measurement using two-stage data envelopment analysis in the Czech and Slovak banking sectors. Acta oeconomica, 69(3), 445–466. DOI: 10.1556/032.2019.69.3.6
[8]     Soleimani-Chamkhorami, K., Lotfi, F. H., Jahanshahloo, G. R., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2019). Preserving cost and revenue efficiency through inverse data envelopment analysis models. Infor, 58(4), 561–578. DOI: 10.1080/03155986.2019.1627780
[9]     Mendelová, V. (2019). Decomposition of cost efficiency with adjustable prices: an application of data envelopment analysis. Operational research, 21(4), 2739--2770. DOI: 10.1007/s12351-019-00525-w
[10]   Shiraz, R. K., Hatami-Marbini, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Fukuyama, H. (2018). Chance-constrained cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis model with random inputs and outputs. Operational research, 20(3), 1863–1898. DOI: 10.1007/S12351-018-0378-1
[11]   Ghiyasi, M. (2017). Inverse DEA based on cost and revenue efficiency. Computers & industrial engineering, 114, 258–263. DOI: 10.1016/J.CIE.2017.10.024
[12]   Toloo, M. (2016). A cost efficiency approach for strategic vendor selection problem under certain input prices assumption. Measurement, 85, 175–183. DOI: 10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2016.02.010
[13]   Khanjani Shiraz, R., Fukuyama, H., Tavana, M., & Di Caprio, D. (2016). An integrated data envelopment analysis and free disposal hull framework for cost-efficiency measurement using rough sets. Applied soft computing, 46, 204–219. DOI: 10.1016/J.ASOC.2016.04.043
[14]   Fang, L., & Li, H. (2015). Cost efficiency in data envelopment analysis under the law of one price. European journal of operational research, 240(2), 488–492. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJOR.2014.07.017
[15]   Mozaffari, M. R., Kamyab, P., Jablonsky, J., & Gerami, J. (2014). Cost and revenue efficiency in DEA-R models. Computers & industrial engineering, 78, 188–194. DOI: 10.1016/J.CIE.2014.10.001
[16]   Sahoo, B. K., Mehdiloozad, M., & Tone, K. (2014). Cost, revenue and profit efficiency measurement in DEA: A directional distance function approach. European journal of operational research, 237(3), 921–931. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.017
[17]   Fang, L., & Li, H. (2013). Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information. Journal of productivity analysis, 40(2), 219–226. DOI: 10.1007/s11123-012-0323-x
[18]   Camanho, A. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2008). A generalisation of the Farrell cost efficiency measure applicable to non-fully competitive settings. Omega, 36(1), 147–162. DOI: 10.1016/J.OMEGA.2005.12.004
[19]   Jahanshahloo, G. R., Soleimani-Damaneh, M., & Mostafaee, A. (2007). Cost efficiency analysis with ordinal data: a theoretical and computational view. International journal of computer mathematics, 84(4), 553–562. DOI: 10.1080/00207160701242243
[20]   Camanho, A. S., & Dyson, R. G. (2005). Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: a DEA application to bank branch assessments. European journal of operational research, 161(2), 432–446. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJOR.2003.07.018
[21]   Jahanshahloo, G. R., Soleimani-damaneh, M., & Mostafaee, A. (2008). A simplified version of the DEA cost efficiency model. European journal of operational research, 184(2), 814–815. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJOR.2006.11.043
[22]   Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2007). Decomposition of cost efficiency and its application to Japanese-US electric utility comparisons. Socio-economic planning sciences, 41(2), 91–106. DOI: 10.1016/J.SEPS.2005.10.007
[23]   Tone, K. (2002). A strange case of the cost and allocative efficiencies in DEA. Journal of the operational research society, 53(11), 1225–1231. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601438
[24]   Soltanifar, M., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., & Mansourzadeh, S. M. (2013). On efficiency in convex hull of DMUs. Applied mathematical modelling, 37(4), 2267–2278.
[25]   Daneshian, B., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., Allahviranloo, T., & Mehrabian, S. (2005). The overall assurance interval for the non-Archimedean epsilon in DEA models. Mathematical and computational applications, 10(3), 387–393.
[26]   Noura, A. A., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Rashidi, S. F., & Parker, B. R. (2010). A new method for measuring congestion in data envelopment analysis. Socio-economic planning sciences, 44(4), 240–246.
[27]   Peykani, P., Mohammadi, E., Emrouznejad, A., Pishvaee, M. S., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2019). Fuzzy data envelopment analysis: an adjustable approach. Expert systems with applications, 136, 439–452.
[28]   Peykani, P., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Sadjadi, S. J., Ebrahimnejad, A., & Mohammadi, E. (2022). Fuzzy chance-constrained data envelopment analysis: a structured literature review, current trends, and future directions. Fuzzy optimization and decision making,21, 197-261.
[29]   Peykani, P., Mohammadi, E., & Emrouznejad, A. (2021). An adjustable fuzzy chance-constrained network DEA approach with application to ranking investment firms. Expert systems with applications, 166, 113938.
[30]   Peykani, P., Mohammadi, E., Saen, R. F., Sadjadi, S. J., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2020). Data envelopment analysis and robust optimization: A review. Expert systems, 37(4), 12534.
[31]   Peykani, P., Mohammadi, E., Jabbarzadeh, A., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2020). A novel two-phase robust portfolio selection and optimization approach under uncertainty: A case study of Tehran stock exchange. Plos one, 15(10), 0239810.
[32]   Peykani, P., Mohammadi, E., & Seyed Esmaeili, F. S. (2019). Stock evaluation under mixed uncertainties using robust DEA model. Journal of quality engineering and production optimization, 4(1), 73–84.