Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, USA.

2 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA.

10.22105/jarie.2024.422077.1569

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to develop a framework utilizing the Constant Returns to Scale (CCR) model of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of workers and ergonomic risk and identify their postural models from efficient frontiers. Surface Electromyography (EMG) data and upper limb joint angle data were collected from volunteers (Decision-Making Units (DMUs) to carry out the DEA analysis. The data was collected for both maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVC) and simple dynamic exercises. The DEA analysis was performed in several phases, including problem formulation and Single-Input-Multiple-Output (SIMO) model analysis. The study used muscle activation levels and upper limb joint angles to evaluate the ergonomic risks and performance of workers and identify role models for typical workers to follow. The study found that incorporating kinematics and EMG data into the DEA model's CCR framework identified efficient frontiers for workers who exhibit less muscle activation and use optimal arm angles while performing their work. The study also showed that workers can learn from their role models who exhibit efficient techniques, including the appropriate arm angle for performing a particular task, to improve their own efficiency. By following these superior work procedures, workers can increase their efficiency, reduce the risk of musculoskeletal problems, and enhance their output. The study concluded that the DEA framework utilizing the CCR model, combined with kinematics and EMG data, can assist in determining the performance of workers and best practices for workers to improve their performance and reduce ergonomic risk.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1]     Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429–444.
[2]     Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
[3]     Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 130(3), 498–509. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221799004075
[4]     Merletti, R., & Farina, D. (2009). Analysis of intramuscular electromyogram signals. Philosophical transactions of the royal society a: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 367(1887), 357–368. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsta.2008.0235
[5]     Criswell, E. (2010). Cram’s introduction to surface electromyography. Jones & Bartlett Learning. https://books.google.com/books?id=ADYm0TqiDo8C
[6]     Avdan, G., Onal, S., & Smith, B. K. (2023). Normalization of EMG signals: optimal MVC positions for the lower limb muscle groups in healthy subjects. Journal of medical and biological engineering, 43(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-023-00782-3
[7]     Rainoldi, A., Melchiorri, G., & Caruso, I. (2004). Rainoldi, A., Melchiorri, G., & Caruso, I. (2004). A method for positioning electrodes during surface EMG recordings in lower limb muscles. Journal of neuroscience methods, 134(1), 37–43. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027003003522
[8]     Malinzak, R. A., Colby, S. M., Kirkendall, D. T., Yu, B., & Garrett, W. E. (2001). A comparison of knee joint motion patterns between men and women in selected athletic tasks. Clinical biomechanics, 16(5), 438–445. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003301000195
[9]     Yen, T. Y., & Radwin, R. G. (2000). Comparison between using spectral analysis of electrogoniometer data and observational analysis to quantify repetitive motion and ergonomic changes in cyclical industrial work. Ergonomics, 43(1), 106–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300184684
[10]   de Oliveira de Souza, J. O., Bloedow, M. D., Rubo, F. C., de Figueiredo, R. M., Pessin, G., & Rigo, S. J. (2021). Investigation of different approaches to real-time control of prosthetic hands with electromyography signals. IEEE sensors journal, 21(18), 20674–20684. DOI:10.1109/JSEN.2021.3099744
[11]   Mößinger, H., Haus, H., Kauer, M., & Schlaak, H. F. (2014). Tactile feedback to the palm using arbitrarily shaped dea. Electroactive polymer actuators and devices (EAPAD) 2014 (Vol. 9056, p. 90563C). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2045302
[12]   Mirmozaffari, M., & Kamal, N. (2023). The application of data envelopment analysis to emergency departments and management of emergency conditions: a narrative Review. Healthcare, 11(18). https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/18/2541
[13]   Keles, E. U., & Alptekin, G. I. (2023). Evaluation of the digitalization efficiency of countries using data envelopment analysis [presentation]. 2023 smart city symposium prague (scsp) (pp. 1–5). DOI: 10.1109/SCSP58044.2023.10146126
[14]   Azadi, M., Yousefi, S., Farzipoor Saen, R., Shabanpour, H., & Jabeen, F. (2023). Forecasting sustainability of healthcare supply chains using deep learning and network data envelopment analysis. Journal of business research, 154, 113357. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322008220
[15]   Li, X., Gül, M., & Al-Hussein, M. (2019). An improved physical demand analysis framework based on ergonomic risk assessment tools for the manufacturing industry. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 70, 58–69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814117301075
[16]   Bosch, T., Mathiassen, S. E., Visser, B., de Looze, M. P., & van Dieën, J. H. (2011). The effect of work pace on workload, motor variability and fatigue during simulated light assembly work. Ergonomics, 54(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2010.538723
[17]   Kumar, S. (2001). Disability, injury and ergonomics intervention. Disability and rehabilitation, 23(18), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110065335
[18]   Kim, S. H., & Chung, M. I. N. K. (1995). Rapid communication effects of posture, weight and frequency on trunk muscular activity and fatigue during repetitive lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 38(5), 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925156
[19]   Cho, S., & Kim, J.-Y. (2012). Straightness and flatness evaluation using data envelopment analysis. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 63(5), 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3925-6
[20]   Li, X. B., & Reeves, G. R. (1999). A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 115(3), 507–517.
[21]   Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2000). Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 113(3), 427–437. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011498001377
[22]   Murthi, B. P. S., Choi, Y. K., & Desai, P. (1997). Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: a non-parametric approach. European journal of operational research, 98(2), 408–418. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221796003566
[23]   Hosseinzadeh, M. M., Ortobelli Lozza, S., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Moriggia, V. (2023). Portfolio optimization with asset preselection using data envelopment analysis. Central european journal of operations research, 31(1), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-022-00808-2
[24]   Roy, D., Cho, S., & Avdan, G. (2023). Ergonomic risk and performance assessment using data envelopment analysis (DEA). IIE annual conference. proceedings (pp. 1–6). https://search.proquest.com/openview/6ee96ab117478815043bcf53925960ac/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=51908
[25]   Beriha, G. S., Patnaik, B., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2011). Safety performance evaluation of Indian organizations using data envelopment analysis. Benchmarking: an international journal, 18(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635771111121676
[26]   Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Data envelopment analysis: history, models, and interpretations. In Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 1–39). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6151-8_1
[27]   Hermens, H. J., Freriks, B., Disselhorst-Klug, C., & Rau, G. (2000). Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 10(5), 361–374. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641100000274
[28]   Konrad, P. (2005). The abc of emg. A practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography, 1(2005), 30–35. http://www.noraxon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/ABC-EMG-ISBN.pdf
[29]   Quittmann, O. J., Meskemper, J., Albracht, K., Abel, T., Foitschik, T., & Strüder, H. K. (2020). Normalising surface EMG of ten upper-extremity muscles in handcycling: manual resistance vs. sport-specific MVICs. Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 51, 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102402
[30]   Zihni, A. M., Ohu, I., Cavallo, J. A., Ousley, J., Cho, S., & Awad, M. M. (2014). FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Surgical endoscopy, 28(8), 2459–2465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3497-7
[31]   Pantha, R. P., Islam, M. S., Akter, N., & Islam, E. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection using integrated data envelopment analysis and differential evolution model. Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, 7(1), 25–35. DOI:10.22105/jarie.2020.213449.1115