Document Type : Research Paper


Magister Industrial Engineering Programme, Postgraduate Faculty , Mercu Buana University Jl. Raya Meruya Selatan, Kembangan, Jakarta 11650.


In August 2016, IATF issued the new requirement of quality management system IATF 16949. With these new requirements, the automotive industry that is willing to migrate to the new version will face some challenges. The main challenge comes from the need to re-map the business processes that are needed for the internal audit. The other challenges are the readiness of the quality of the internal auditors, measure gaps, and predict the success of the certification audits. This research is based on a case study at one of the automotive manufacturing company. A framework for measuring the gap analysis of the compliance based on the automotive standards requirements (IATF 16949: 2016) through an internal quality audit score has presented in this research. The analysis has done by using a turtle diagram for risk analysis and follows by a survey on an internal quality auditor’s perception. Based on the analysis, it can be determined which processes need to be audited. The research has found that there are 32 processes in the company which is needed to be an audit. The survey has indicated that internal quality auditor is ready with the new requirement of the quality management system. The internal audit’s result with a weighted score shows the level that can be achieved by the company to fulfill the standard IATF 16949:2016. The gap that has shown in the spider chart depicts that an automotive manufacturing company will be able to passe the certification audit.


Main Subjects

[1]   Parkin, R., Couttie, M., Viereckl, R., Shiraishi, Sh., Jaruzelski, B., Singh, A., Jullens, J., Hirsh, E., & Majdalani, F.  (2017). Automotive industry trends - The future depends   on improving returns on capital. Retrieved from
[2]   McKinsey. (2013). The road to 2020 and beyond: What’s driving the global automotive industry?. Retrieved from
[3]   Rezaei, A. R., Çelik, T., & Baalousha, Y. (2011). Performance measurement in a quality management system. Scientia iranica18(3), 742-752.
[4]   Santoso, D., & Besral, A. M. (2018). Supplier performance assessment using analytical hierarchy process method. Sinergi: Jurnal teknik mercu buana22(1), 37-44.
[5]   RAI technology university. (n.d.). World class manufacturing. Retrieved from
[6]   AIAG. (2016). IATF 16949: 2016- Quality management system requirements for automotive production and relevant service part organizations. Retrieved from
[7]   Ostadi, B., Aghdasi, M., & Kazemzadeh, R. B. (2010). The impact of ISO/TS 16949 on automotive industries and created organizational capabilities from its implementation. Journal of industrial engineering and management3(3), 494-511.
[8]   Deo Feo, J. A. (2015).  Juran’s quality management and analysis. Mc Graw Hill International Edition.
[9]   IATF. (2016). Rules for achieving and maintaining IATF recognition. Retrieved from
[10]ISO 9001 : 2015  Quality Management System – Requirement. (2015). Retrieved from
[11]Desai, D., Aston, B., Briggs, s., Cianfrani, Ch., Gluck, A., Palmes, P., Robitaille, D., & West, J. (2015). Keep calm and prepare for ISO 9001:2015. Retrieved from
[12]Quality management principle. (2015). Retrieved from
[13]Gruszka, J., & Misztal, A. (2017). The new IATF 16949: 2016 standard in the automotive supply chain. Research in logistics & production7.
[14]Internal audit ISO 9001 : 2015. (2015). Retrieved from
[15]Risk based thinking in ISO 9001 : 2015. (2015). Retrieved from
[16]Dan Reid. R. (2017). Keys to IATF 16949:2016. Retrieved from
[18]Mihail, L. A. (2009). Organisational process mapping for ISO/TS 16949: 2009 certification of industrial quality management systems. Bulletin of the Transilvania university of Brasov. Engineering sciences. series I2, 89.
[19]Dunmire, T., & Cianfrani, Ch. A. (2015). Expert answers-internal audit programms. Retrieved from
[20]Dan Reid. R. (2017). IATF 16949:2016-Troublesome transitions. Retrieved from
[21]Boudreaux, M. (2010). What’s the difference? Series: Gap analysis vs. internal audits vs. pre-assessment. Retrieved from
[22]Bugay, F. (2017). Visual aid-new tool conversts QMS audit findings to radar charts. Retrieved from
[23]Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2008). Bussiness research methods. New York,  NY: McGraw-Hill.
[24]Zulganef. (2008). Metode penelitian sosial dan bisnis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
[25]Sudarmanto, R. G. (2005). Analisis regresi linear ganda dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
[26]Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). New York: McGraw-Hill. Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
[27]Wade, M. V. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson international institute for tourism & research development, department of parks, recreation and tourism management, clemson university.
[28]Allen, I. E., & Seaman, Ch. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Retrieved from